Six reference readings. Three AI-assisted perspectives. Explore what connects them, with the sources and limits in view.
Demonstration issue — no CME credit awarded.
PSYCHIATRY · HISTORICAL EVIDENCE
Read this issue in context
Six papers first published in January 2024. Assembled in September 2026; not a current practice guideline.
Evidence month: · Assembled:
Review status. AI-assisted educational demonstration; independent clinical review not documented.
Verification limits. Full-text sources and relevant findings were inspected. Independent retraction/correction registry checks and some disclosure extraction remain incomplete. This limitation must remain visible until resolved.
Learning objectives and editorial notes
Identify the population, comparator, outcome and time frame behind a claim.
Distinguish group-level evidence from individual prediction and clinical utility.
Communicate treatment and prognosis evidence without guarantees or unwarranted pessimism.
Original educational summaries and reflections. Source articles are linked, not reproduced. Free full-text access does not imply unrestricted republication rights.
25 September 2026 · Reading 03 clarification: 1,023 is the NEON trial’s modified intention-to-treat sample after duplicate registration accounts were removed. The wording now identifies this analysis population explicitly; see the linked P03 trial report.
AI connects ideas across this issue’s six readings into three fixed articles. Follow the references, inspect the interpretation, and see where the evidence stops.
Bounded by design. Six source readings. Fixed AI-assisted text. Visible references and limits.No live generation
On your reading list 06
0 of 6 read
Q20
A MOMENT TO REFLECT
What will you take with you?
20 questions across this edition’s reading. Learn as you go, with explanations for every answer.